http://daisyne.xanga.com/702948708/1998135211228253034020845222352356038988/
前一天還慶幸自己在一家包容性和多元性皆強的雜誌工作。
六四專題難做,lifestyle 雜誌的六四專題更難做,論政治性新聞性,我們不比跟日報比媲,想義正嚴詞大呼平反六四又怕老氣橫秋,經過不斷的推倒重來,我們找到了方向,並實踐了。
文章寫好、相片拍好、layout 砌好,甚至已經送往印刷,但最後,因為大老闆的一個電話,專題被抽掉,同時,有關該期雜誌中所有提及六四字眼的文章,皆要經過修改,三小時之後,這個六四專題真的可以消失得無影無踪,彷彿從未出現過。
然後,一個狐假虎威的公司高層,把我和幾位相關的同事叫到會議室,會議室氣氛很凝重,我們似是犯下彌天大禍。那名高層手拿著那份專輯的 copy,上面的文字被黃色的螢光筆畫得一塌糊塗,然後她將「有問題」的句子逐句讀出,說:「這是煽動。」當然還有一堆不知所謂的說法,包括公司的決定毋須要向員工解釋,若有不滿同事可以隨時離職等屁話,還假猩猩的問大家有何意見。
他媽的我還可以有甚麼意見,你是老闆,你說了算,但她居然還說我像是不認同公司立場,我是打工,但不是你的走狗,無須甚麼屁都要與公司同一立場吧!你有權禁止你認為有損害公司在內地生意利益的東西刊出,你有權炒我,我有權不做,但是你不必像文字獄般逐隻字審查我那一字有煽動成份,這裡是香港,不是大陸,而且即使這份專題寫著我名字去大陸派我也不信有人要捉我去打把,別弄得像是我們犯了殺頭般的大罪似的。
撫心自問,是次六四專題的文字圖片內容,不算處理得特別出色,當中也沒有甚或驚天動地的內幕要爆,但是我不憤。
好可怕。我原本覺得壹傳媒偏激,但我發現,原來香港剩下願意咆哮聲音的,或許只有它了。
好可怕。原來沒有人抹殺香港的新聞和言論自由,是我們的媒體集團為利益甘願放棄。
好可怕。從前覺得內地用強硬的手段,又捉又打又軟禁的,控制人們的言行,好可怕,之後感覺近年好像好了點,到奧運時又好像再好了一點。但現在,我發現,原來軟霸權更可怕,中國強大了,他們不必再用任 physically 的手法打壓人們,只要不讓你回國經商,那麼想賺錢的人們便會乖乖收聲。我感覺如此情況還將繼續發展,中國好野!
2009年5月26日,《君子雜誌》的 143 至 156 頁被他們抽走了,但他們不能在日曆上抽了六月四日。感謝歷史讓我們看清商人的真貌。
不見天的六四專題(YouTube版)
http://wanszezit.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/不見天的六四專題(youtube版)
May 29, 2009 at 3:25 pm
前一天還慶幸自己在一家包容性和多元性皆強的雜誌工作。 <- 我不覺得南傳是「包容性和多元性皆強的」企業喎。
有沒有打算將這一篇blog譯成英文,然後「知會」一下美國《君子》的編輯們?
http://www.esquire.com/talk
(其實寄電郵給Hearst的CEO也許更佳,可惜我找不到他的電郵!)
http://www.hearst.com/about.php
May 29, 2009 at 4:02 pm
@stripeboy
xD…by Google Translate
Do not see the light of 64 thematic
The day before was also glad that they are inclusive and in a diversity magazine are strong.
64 difficult topics, lifestyle magazine feature 64 more difficult to do so, on the political news, we will not match with the Daily News than, I would like justice is vindicated shouted sternly afraid mature 64, replaced after a constant, we find the direction and put into practice.
Articles written, a good photo shoot, layout, and even has taken to printing, but in the end, because the big boss of a call, the topic was removed, at the same time, the magazine of the period of 64 words in all references to the article, are to a modified, three hours later, the 64 thematic really can disappear without trace, as if it has not seen.
Then, a top management, and several of my colleagues called the relevant conference room, conference room atmosphere is very grave, and we commit mortal seems great. That the share of high-level album hand copy, the text above by the number of strokes a fluorescent yellow mess, and then she would be “problematic” of the sentence read out sentence by sentence, said: “This is incitement.” I do not know of course, a pile of that the so-called, including the company’s decision not to explain to the staff, if dissatisfied with my colleagues to leave at any time, such as nonsense, but also leave the orangutan we have any views on the question.
Hell I could have any views, you are the boss, you say, but she actually said I do not agree with companies such as position, I was working, but it is not your running dog, there is no company should be the same fart stand it! Do you think you have the right to prohibit damage to the business interests of companies in the Mainland of things published, you have the right to speculation, I have the right to do, but you do not have to like wenziyu as a word-by-word review that I have the element of incitement, this is Hong Kong, not mainland China, and even if I read the name of the topic to the mainland was to send a letter and I do not want to go to catch me, do not make as if we committed a sin like behead her.
Soul-searching, the text of the 64 thematic content, which is not handled especially well, which did not even have to insider or earth-shattering explosion, but I do not anger.
Terrible good. I did think that the Next Media extreme, but I found that the rest of Hong Kong are willing to growl sound, perhaps only it.
Terrible good. No one denied that the press and freedom of expression in Hong Kong is our group for the interests of the media are willing to forego.
Terrible good. Used to think that the mainland by means of hard-line, but also catch and play again under house arrest, control people’s words and deeds, so terrible, after feeling better in recent years seems to point to the Olympic Games when it seems a bit better. But now, I have found that more terrible soft hegemony, China’s powerful, they physically do not have to use any means to suppress it, as long as you return home from business, wants to make more money then people will obediently shut up. I feel that the situation will continue to develop, China is good wild!
May 26, 2009, “gentlemen’s magazine” of the 143-156 they suck out, but they can not smoke in the calendar of June 4. Let us thank the history to see the true features businessmen.
May 29, 2009 at 6:49 pm
黎智英:我唔做契弟。
偏偏,世界上實在有太多契弟!
May 30, 2009 at 12:09 am
Ala…xanga本身都被河蟹了嗎?
也不止啦, 至少明報也會支持六四~
2009年5月26日,《君子雜誌》的 143 至 156 頁被他們抽走了,但他們不能在日曆上抽了六月四日。
咦, 這跟我的構思差不多呢ww
May 30, 2009 at 1:31 am
作者的xanga看不到了,可能免得公司秋後算帳吧。
July 2, 2009 at 10:27 pm
2009年5月26日,《君子雜誌》的 143 至 156 頁被他們抽走了.
I want to read those pages.